Democrats in the North Carolina legislature are proposing a slew of increases in our state income and sales taxes. One Democratic leader said it was the "least painful thing that we could come up with." That's a serious indictment, in my view, on their leadership skills, economic understanding, and innovative thinking. And it could prove to be the "straw that broke the camel's back", the scrub that removes the tar from our heels and send us fleeing to another state with a less-onerous tax burden.
North Taxolina?
According to the Tax Foundation, North Carolina ranked 20th in 2008 in its state/local tax burden on its citizens, with a total burden of 9.8%, already worse than Taxachusetts. If these proposed increases are passed, North Carolina will likely vault into the Top 10 (or should that be the Bottom 10 – certainly the Worst 10), edging ever closer to states like California and New York.
It's interesting to note that our state ranks only 47th in tax collections from non-residents (see Table 6 in the above link). The most familiar form of this sort of taxation is the state/local tax on hotel rooms, rental cars, etc. But some states are experimenting with separate property tax rates for non-residents, such as non-North Carolinians who own beach homes in Corolla, or mountain chalets in Boone. I don't know if NC does this, but it would seem like a better solution, or at least a better place to start.
If North Carolina could raise its tax collections on non-residents to the 50-state average of such collections (and with our vibrant tourism, from beaches to mountains, you'd think we could do just that), then that would raise an additional $3.6 BILLION annually, almost 4 times what would theoretically be collected from this proposal. (The math: an extra $397 per capita x a population of over 9 million.)
Vote With Your Address
One reason why I prefer local and state government over the federal government is that citizens can more readily vote with their addresses to support or oppose government policies. In the case of state income taxes, I could move to Texas (or Florida or Tennessee or a few others) today and pay ZERO state income tax. Yes, I'd find a slightly higher sales tax and probably a higher property tax rate, but my net income would rise by about 1.5%. And that's BEFORE these proposed hikes. By raising sales taxes to 7%, and the top income tax rate from 7.75% to 8.5%, the gap grows from 1.5% to 2.5%.
Now, I'm not in that top tax bracket, but having just started my own business, I do hope to see it (the business) grow to that level. My business is such that I could locate it anywhere I choose to live. And while we love living here, the tax burden is definitely a consideration.
So what happens if you raise taxes? Why is it any different from another "good or service" when its prices are raised? You raise the cost of working here, and fewer people will want to work here. How does that help narrow the budget deficit, and increase tax revenues? In short, it doesn't help.
Isn't That A Contradiction?
On the one hand, I seem to be arguing that additional taxes on out-of-state tourists and business travelers will help, but additional taxes on in-state residents and businesses will hurt. Isn't that a contradiction? It's a fair question. Let's face the truth – tourism type taxes are less visible, and less likely to foment behavioral change, compared to income taxes. In the short run, any tax hike is likely to increase tax revenues, until behavioral changes and address changes take hold.
Budget Cuts
With all this discussion of which type of tax is less onerous, don't think I've forgotten a first principle that governments are into way more things than they should be. Yes, there've been some cuts already, but I don't get the sense that the legislature is really working hard enough to make the state government as efficient as it could be. In lean times, things have to be cut, even things that we like.
You're already doing it with your family budget, I would guess. The proposed tax hike is supposed to raise an extra 5% to close the budget gap. Couldn't our representatives find 5% of the $18-20 billion budget to set aside for now? In our family budget, we are cutting back significantly more than 5% in our spending. We've cut out things that we enjoy, things that are important to us. But you have to make hard choices in times like these. Shouldn't we expect our elected representatives, of all people, to stand up and make some hard budget-cutting choices?